In Chapter 4 of the reading, Chauncy discusses the need for
gay men in the city to forge separate identities. One needed to be “manly” and
unquestionably heterosexual. With a second “private” identity, he could be
whoever he wanted, someone free to express his sexuality in whatever form they
desired. They could be a fairy or refuse to label themselves and thereby
“preserve” their masculinity.
The public’s view of fairies colored their entire
perspective of homosexuality. They weren’t “manly” so couldn’t be associated
with males, they weren’t fully female, but rather labeled as “third-sexers.”
Other homosexual men refused to acknowledge it because they didn’t want to be
associated with fairies. One clerk in the 1930s was quoted saying, “I had heard
about fairies and I began to be alarmed. I would cringe at the thought that I
was one of them, although there was always some man I desired” (100). Hence the
need for the multiple identities mentioned above.
Today, unfortunately, I think a lot of this type of thinking
stills exists. While they may not directly form different identities, many do
have to act differently in a work environment than in their private lives. In
my Voices of Discovery section we discussed this a bit. One person said that
they had a “work persona,” which they described as more toned down than the one they displayed in their private life. They consciously
projected a more heterosexual persona in order to avoid persecution. They
didn’t put pictures up of their significant other so as not to alert coworkers
of their sexual orientation.
To me, it is disheartening that many still feel as though it
is not safe for them because of their sexual orientation, that many still do
not have equal rights under law. That a governor finds it acceptable to revoke
protection laws for LGBT state employees (http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-kansas-governor-gay-protection-20150210-story.html)
and that fewer than half of the states have statewide laws protecting against
discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Although the
reading did raise some interesting points about the role of masculinity in
society in the 1890s through 1940, as far as sexual orientation goes, I thought
that there were some strong similarities between society’s view of
homosexuality in 1890 and 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment